<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Last Exile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastexiled.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastexiled.com</link>
	<description>residence-in-exile of The Last Amazon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:05:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Justice or Tory Justice? by Backseat Blogger</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/10/blind-justice-or-tory-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-3822</link>
		<dc:creator>Backseat Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4480#comment-3822</guid>
		<description>Again, I agree with you in theory.  It&#039;s the practise that I&#039;m having difficulty with.

Yes a judge has a lot of power but he can only act on the basis of the charges/evidence before him.  if the Crown &lt;b&gt;withdraws&lt;/b&gt; a charge, a judge can&#039;t reinstate it.  

the judge acted properly on the basis of the evidence before him.

there are rumours that the evidence re drugs/alcohol etc was tainted due to the improper actions of a rookie cop.  crown counsel is only saying that there were problems with this evidence.

this goes back to my original point. crown counsel will be loathe to make public the rationale for its decisions.. especially if there are screwups.  

the police will no be too happy with prosecutors if the police get blamed for that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I agree with you in theory.  It&#8217;s the practise that I&#8217;m having difficulty with.</p>
<p>Yes a judge has a lot of power but he can only act on the basis of the charges/evidence before him.  if the Crown <b>withdraws</b> a charge, a judge can&#8217;t reinstate it.  </p>
<p>the judge acted properly on the basis of the evidence before him.</p>
<p>there are rumours that the evidence re drugs/alcohol etc was tainted due to the improper actions of a rookie cop.  crown counsel is only saying that there were problems with this evidence.</p>
<p>this goes back to my original point. crown counsel will be loathe to make public the rationale for its decisions.. especially if there are screwups.  </p>
<p>the police will no be too happy with prosecutors if the police get blamed for that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Justice or Tory Justice? by Kateland</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/10/blind-justice-or-tory-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>Kateland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4480#comment-3821</guid>
		<description>Actually, yes the public does have the right to know – there are certain circumstances where information may be banned for publication – before or during a trial if there is a chance it could prejudice a juror - or if a witness, victim or defendant is under the age of majority or if there is a risk it would harm or prejudice another either on-going or coming matter before the courts.

Crime reportage is a potentially libelous area which is why so many on-line media disable the commenting features on the publication of such news. Frankly, so many of the public don&#039;t think of the possible legal implications before they hit the send button on a rant roasting the alleged criminal of the day. 

Public criminal justice is a cornerstone of our legal system and one of the key principles which our legal traditions are based on. I really didn&#039;t mention the Crown Attorney&#039;s role, but quite frankly, the Justice did not have to accept the plea arrangement – it was within his powers to resist the arrangement made between the Crown Attorney and the Defense counsel – and even had a duty to do so if it would bring the justice system into disrepute – which it in effect it has done. These were very serious charges which were dismissed in exchange for a plea agreement to a very minor traffic offense.

I am not so reasonably sure the Crown&#039;s reasoning was necessarily sound - especially in retrospect – given Jaffer&#039;s acceptence of the deal – an innocent man with his financial resources would probably wanted to fight the charges at trial and be found &#039;not guilty&#039; rather than have the accusations hang over him. Remember, he has not been found innocent in a public trial merely that the Crown believes there is a lack of reasonable evidence for a conviction. Two entirely different matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, yes the public does have the right to know – there are certain circumstances where information may be banned for publication – before or during a trial if there is a chance it could prejudice a juror &#8211; or if a witness, victim or defendant is under the age of majority or if there is a risk it would harm or prejudice another either on-going or coming matter before the courts.</p>
<p>Crime reportage is a potentially libelous area which is why so many on-line media disable the commenting features on the publication of such news. Frankly, so many of the public don&#8217;t think of the possible legal implications before they hit the send button on a rant roasting the alleged criminal of the day. </p>
<p>Public criminal justice is a cornerstone of our legal system and one of the key principles which our legal traditions are based on. I really didn&#8217;t mention the Crown Attorney&#8217;s role, but quite frankly, the Justice did not have to accept the plea arrangement – it was within his powers to resist the arrangement made between the Crown Attorney and the Defense counsel – and even had a duty to do so if it would bring the justice system into disrepute – which it in effect it has done. These were very serious charges which were dismissed in exchange for a plea agreement to a very minor traffic offense.</p>
<p>I am not so reasonably sure the Crown&#8217;s reasoning was necessarily sound &#8211; especially in retrospect – given Jaffer&#8217;s acceptence of the deal – an innocent man with his financial resources would probably wanted to fight the charges at trial and be found &#8216;not guilty&#8217; rather than have the accusations hang over him. Remember, he has not been found innocent in a public trial merely that the Crown believes there is a lack of reasonable evidence for a conviction. Two entirely different matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blind Justice or Tory Justice? by Backseat Blogger</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/10/blind-justice-or-tory-justice/comment-page-1/#comment-3819</link>
		<dc:creator>Backseat Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4480#comment-3819</guid>
		<description>seriously, kateland, while i might agree with you in theory...
does the public actually have the legal RIGHT to know?
the way things work now our traditionally secretive bureaucracy now has the additional weapon of &#039;privacy concerns&#039; to hide behind.
haven&#039;t you noticed that &#039;news&#039; reports regarding crime reporting are remarkably vague in detail these days?
any questions about the decision to prosecute as it did belong to Ontario&#039;s crown prosecutions&#039; office.  don&#039;t forget that with our divided Crown while the feds make the laws it the provinces that administer them
good luck in getting an answer out of Ontario.

oh.. and if Mr. Jaffer ever hopes to get back  into politics, he&#039;s going to have to a lot better than his initial public response.  as things stand now, he&#039;s done like dinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously, kateland, while i might agree with you in theory&#8230;<br />
does the public actually have the legal RIGHT to know?<br />
the way things work now our traditionally secretive bureaucracy now has the additional weapon of &#8216;privacy concerns&#8217; to hide behind.<br />
haven&#8217;t you noticed that &#8216;news&#8217; reports regarding crime reporting are remarkably vague in detail these days?<br />
any questions about the decision to prosecute as it did belong to Ontario&#8217;s crown prosecutions&#8217; office.  don&#8217;t forget that with our divided Crown while the feds make the laws it the provinces that administer them<br />
good luck in getting an answer out of Ontario.</p>
<p>oh.. and if Mr. Jaffer ever hopes to get back  into politics, he&#8217;s going to have to a lot better than his initial public response.  as things stand now, he&#8217;s done like dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by Kateland</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3816</link>
		<dc:creator>Kateland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3816</guid>
		<description>Yep - you were joking, I was joking....accept everything in the Arab world is considered a Zionist plot. 

Re: Israeli police

I am not going to spend a lot of time answering you – I have a whole host of other commitments but this is something which is spoken of quite freely in Israeli society. Last figures which stick out in my  mind (circa 2007-08) suggested that 80% of the Israeli public had no faith in their &#039;police forces&#039; and believe police corruption and brutality is epidemic. A number of police corruption scandals have hit Israel in the last 10 years – especially in the southern command. There was a blue ribbon panel/commission in/about 2007 or so when the witnesses to police corruption demanded not only immunity but to enter the witness protection program. Then of course there is the &#039;regular&#039; run of police brutality charges.  Take a look at this visit by the Israeli police to a Satmar yeshiva. I am not fan of Satmars but the random level of random violence used by police is completely appalling in a yeshiva setting. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v37n0LBtseo 

Then think back to Amona where even Knesset members who were protesting non-violently were brutally attacked – although the Yassam was also  heavily involved in that instance.   

 The Dati-camp has been complaining along time about police brutality but their claims were treated dismissively and  written off  because their from the &#039;settler&#039; camp.  Here is a right of centre blogger from Shiloh. 

http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2008/03/illustarted-manual-for-police-brutality.html  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep &#8211; you were joking, I was joking&#8230;.accept everything in the Arab world is considered a Zionist plot. </p>
<p>Re: Israeli police</p>
<p>I am not going to spend a lot of time answering you – I have a whole host of other commitments but this is something which is spoken of quite freely in Israeli society. Last figures which stick out in my  mind (circa 2007-08) suggested that 80% of the Israeli public had no faith in their &#8216;police forces&#8217; and believe police corruption and brutality is epidemic. A number of police corruption scandals have hit Israel in the last 10 years – especially in the southern command. There was a blue ribbon panel/commission in/about 2007 or so when the witnesses to police corruption demanded not only immunity but to enter the witness protection program. Then of course there is the &#8216;regular&#8217; run of police brutality charges.  Take a look at this visit by the Israeli police to a Satmar yeshiva. I am not fan of Satmars but the random level of random violence used by police is completely appalling in a yeshiva setting. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v37n0LBtseo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v37n0LBtseo</a> </p>
<p>Then think back to Amona where even Knesset members who were protesting non-violently were brutally attacked – although the Yassam was also  heavily involved in that instance.   </p>
<p> The Dati-camp has been complaining along time about police brutality but their claims were treated dismissively and  written off  because their from the &#8217;settler&#8217; camp.  Here is a right of centre blogger from Shiloh. </p>
<p><a href="http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2008/03/illustarted-manual-for-police-brutality.html  " rel="nofollow">http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2008/03/illustarted-manual-for-police-brutality.html  </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by Backseat Blogger</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3814</link>
		<dc:creator>Backseat Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3814</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-3812&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-3812&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kateland&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
If everything from bananas and chewing gum are a Zionist plot – what isn’t?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

you do realize i was joking kateland, i hope!  
yr comment reminds of the latest leftoid meme that if everything is antisemitic then nothing is antisemitic.

re: rough types in jerusalem police.... you got some urls about the rough characters(not to criticize... just to learn)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-3812"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-3812" rel="nofollow">Kateland</a> :</strong><br />
If everything from bananas and chewing gum are a Zionist plot – what isn’t?
</p></blockquote>
<p>you do realize i was joking kateland, i hope!<br />
yr comment reminds of the latest leftoid meme that if everything is antisemitic then nothing is antisemitic.</p>
<p>re: rough types in jerusalem police&#8230;. you got some urls about the rough characters(not to criticize&#8230; just to learn)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by Kateland</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3812</link>
		<dc:creator>Kateland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3812</guid>
		<description>If everything from bananas and chewing gum are a Zionist plot - what isn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If everything from bananas and chewing gum are a Zionist plot &#8211; what isn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by Kateland</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3811</link>
		<dc:creator>Kateland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3811</guid>
		<description>I agree with you about the IDF except this case doesn&#039;t involve the IDF but the Jerusalem Police, who have some very rough characters if routine accounts are to be believed.  I would normally prefer to not come to their attention...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you about the IDF except this case doesn&#8217;t involve the IDF but the Jerusalem Police, who have some very rough characters if routine accounts are to be believed.  I would normally prefer to not come to their attention&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by Backseat Blogger</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>Backseat Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>where do u get off calling the haram el shariff the &#039;temple mount.&#039;  Don&#039;t you know that there never was any jewish temple in al quds.  it&#039;s all a zionist plot.
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where do u get off calling the haram el shariff the &#8216;temple mount.&#8217;  Don&#8217;t you know that there never was any jewish temple in al quds.  it&#8217;s all a zionist plot.<br />
 <img src='http://lastexiled.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Third Infitada by beachnut</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/03/05/third-infitada/comment-page-1/#comment-3806</link>
		<dc:creator>beachnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4469#comment-3806</guid>
		<description>The restraint by the IDF always astounds me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The restraint by the IDF always astounds me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Purim or the balancing act between life and death by Backseat Blogger</title>
		<link>http://lastexiled.com/index.php/2010/02/26/purim-or-the-balancing-act-between-life-and-death/comment-page-1/#comment-3783</link>
		<dc:creator>Backseat Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexiled.com/?p=4444#comment-3783</guid>
		<description>oh man, ain&#039;t that the truth beachnut!

it is sooooooooooooo creepy when you see these couples dressed IDENTICALLY coming down the street.   There&#039;s just something a little bit &#039;off&#039; about them :D

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-3781&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-3781&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;beachnut &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;His rifle strap doesn’t match.And I think it’s tacky to wear similar shoes like his date.He should have his own style.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man, ain&#8217;t that the truth beachnut!</p>
<p>it is sooooooooooooo creepy when you see these couples dressed IDENTICALLY coming down the street.   There&#8217;s just something a little bit &#8216;off&#8217; about them <img src='http://lastexiled.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote cite="#commentbody-3781"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-3781" rel="nofollow">beachnut </a> :</strong>His rifle strap doesn’t match.And I think it’s tacky to wear similar shoes like his date.He should have his own style.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
